#FOLIO BOOKS JAMES BOND SERIES#

While it’s true Bond is a sexist, but he doesn’t benefit from his sexism, and after reading the book, no sensible person would believe the message was that men of the 1950s were doing just fine. In this way, Bond is a true anti-hero, and the novel Casino Royale, a kind of indictment of the male ego. Instead, what Bond is saying is that it’s arrogant for him to presume to know the people he’s going after are evil and that he’s good for going after them. This isn’t an argument for moral relativism or an anything-goes mentality. As Bond says “.when one’s young, it seems very easy to distinguish between right and wrong, but as one gets older it becomes more difficult.” Maybe being a macho killer who works for the government is wrong. After Bond is kidnapped and tortured, he actually buys some of the arguments made against his line of work: Maybe patriotism is weird. The difference between the novel and the film is the tone. Yes, he’s bailed out of his gambling losses by the CIA, and, as in the film, is able to defeat the evil Le Chiffre at the baccarat table. In fact, if you’re just tallying his victories in general, it’s actually hard to find one single thing that truly goes his way.

James Bond loses a lot in Casino Royale, far more than he wins. And, when he loses all his government’s money at the Baccarat table at the end of chapter 11, he doesn’t clench his jaw and make a joke. When Bond is almost killed by a small bomb in chapter 6, he doesn’t dust himself and straighten his tie, he nearly passes out and throws up. Tristan Fewings/Getty Images Entertainment/Getty ImagesĬasino Royale is a spy novel, but it’s a deadly serious one, a world in which the thrills are just as grotesque as they are exciting. But, in 1953, that’s just what the book was about.įirst editions of Thunderball, Casino Royale, and Diamonds Are Forever.

#FOLIO BOOKS JAMES BOND SERIES#

But the biggest difference between the 1953 novel and the 2006 film is simple: In 2006, the depth and pathos that Daniel Craig’s Bond felt seemed subversive to the rest of the film series to that point. If your only experience of Casino Royale is just the 2006 Daniel Craig movie, know this: Of all the Bond films it’s probably the only handful of the films that both closely follow the plot one of the source material and actually capture the tone and meaning of the book.

Published seven decades ago on April 13, 1953, Casino Royale created a new kind of action thriller - one that wasn’t afraid to actually mock its male protagonist. And, in many ways, the first Bond book, is still the best. No with Sean Connery as James Bond is certainly more visible, but without Fleming and his books, the phenomenon of Bond simply wouldn’t exist. It was called Casino Royale and it not only changed Fleming’s life but shocked and thrilled the entire world. Just before his getting married, at the age of 43, former British Naval officer Ian Fleming sat down at his typewriter, after what many biographers say was five years of procrastinating.

Folio books james bond